[REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 8460
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by ghost »   0 likes

Let's see if this works... First time sharing a file on emule.
It works great. Thanks for this better version.

...But I doubt, if you really can see a big difference in these 2 screenshots. :think
reptile12
Posts: 224
Likes:
Joined: Sat May 18, 2019 5:38 pm

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by reptile12 »   0 likes

OK cool
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 8460
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by ghost »   2 likes

Here are the english subtitles (matching to my release):
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   18 likes

User avatar
Warg
Posts: 772
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:24 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Warg »   0 likes

When I clicked reptile's postimage pictures I was twice relinked to a malware site of the "Windows is infected by ..." type and avast blocked a com-file from downloading :shock:. Anyone with similar experiences? Do we have to use postimage now with caution? :?
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

Warg wrote:When I clicked reptile's postimage pictures I was twice relinked to a malware site of the "Windows is infected by ..." type and avast blocked a com-file from downloading :shock:. Anyone with similar experiences? Do we have to use postimage now with caution? :?
I'm not getting anything like that just now when I checked, and didn't when he first posted it. I don't know if it's because my antivirus and blockers are preventing it, but I never got a warning, and I know ghost viewed them too and didn't mention anything wrong.
User avatar
Warg
Posts: 772
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:24 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Warg »   0 likes

Phuzzy4242 wrote:
Warg wrote:When I clicked reptile's postimage pictures I was twice relinked to a malware site of the "Windows is infected by ..." type and avast blocked a com-file from downloading :shock:. Anyone with similar experiences? Do we have to use postimage now with caution? :?
I'm not getting anything like that just now when I checked, and didn't when he first posted it. I don't know if it's because my antivirus and blockers are preventing it, but I never got a warning, and I know ghost viewed them too and didn't mention anything wrong.
Strange. I retried it right now with the same result: the postimage page is displayed orderly but the flm page is relinked to a site called Ampugi334f.c*om that normally reloads only porn sites like mrskin but sometimes you get fake virus alerts like this (potentially dangerous for newbies):

[Image]

This is what the internet gave about the site:
https://wa-com.com/ampugi334f.com
https://ip-46.com/198.134.112.241#ip-info :o :shock:
User avatar
ghost
Site Admin
Posts: 8460
Likes:
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by ghost »   0 likes

I didn't got any problems or alert at all when opening the pics as well.

Maybe your system is infected somehow?

OK, we could discuss the sense of anti virus programs in general ;) But that's a different story...
User avatar
Warg
Posts: 772
Likes:
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:24 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Warg »   0 likes

ghost wrote:Maybe your system is infected somehow?
Hardly, since it's only these two pictures that trigger it ... :?
User avatar
Phuzzy4242
Site Admin
Posts: 7686
Likes:
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 1:00 am

Re: [REL] Systemsprenger (2019)

Post by Phuzzy4242 »   0 likes

Here are those two images again. I downloaded them and ran two virus scanners on them without finding anything. Check them now and see if they trip your virus scanner.

5GB rip:
[Image]

2.8GB rip:
[Image]

Just as an aside, I can't tell any difference in quality when I flip back and forth between them, and both these pix are 1280x727.
Post Reply